Why Do So Many Authors Forget To Create Characters?

It genuinely puzzles me…

Image by JULIO VICENTE from Pixabay

I read a lot. A few books a week usually. I have a to-read-list in a notebook and I jot down the titles of anything I come across on social media or anything recommended to me that sounds like my kind of thing. I am a bit fussy – I’ll admit that – but there isn’t much I won’t read other than romance and erotica. I’m not mad keen on fantasy in its typical form but I will read anything paranormal, supernatural or magical.

I don’t consider myself a reading snob. I do have a few favourite authors of whom I will happily devour every new release they put out. I’m not majorly into the classics and I read graphic novels and comic books as well as traditional books.

But there is one thing that annoys me and frustrates me more than anything else and I just keep coming across it – more often than not in traditionally published books with amazing sales and thousands of reviews…

Authors who forget to create characters!

Now, bear with me. Obviously these authors don’t pen books with no characters, expecting the location and plot to carry themselves. But it does feel a bit like this:

Author checklist

location: researched, described beautifully – check

plot – ironed out, checked over, worked through, twists and turns, no plot holes – check

research into topic – yup, done – check

writing skills/talent – yep, can string a sentence together and construct a story – check

characters – oh, they’ll do. – check

NOOOOO!

They won’t do. ‘Any old character’ will not do. I’m genuinely getting sick of it so excuse me if this comes across as a bit of a rant. Before I talk about the lack of characterisation that has driven me crazy lately in numerous books I’ve read, (and I won’t be naming them, to be fair to the authors) let me first tell you about a book that has got its characters right.

I am currently reading Deadly Animals by Marie Tierney. It’s a crime thriller about a serial killer and its set in 1980s Birmingham, UK. It’s the author’s debut novel which I find incredibly exciting as I would happily read anything else she releases. I won’t go into the plot too much but essentially the main character is a 13 year-old girl called Ava, who has the unusual hobby of searching for and studying dead animals. It’s while doing this she comes across the body of the first victim, a teenage boy she knew. Ava is quite simply a memorable character. She is smart, wise beyond her years, fiercely loyal to her friends and her dysfunctional family, and she is constantly one step ahead of the police in solving the crimes. However, the other characters are also wonderfully drawn. Her best friend John has his own personality, life and background, as do the two detectives Delahaye and Lines. I would argue that Delahaye is another main character along with Ava, but Lines is just as well realised.

Let me put it simply. There are two detectives investigating and they have different personalities. You know, like real people do in real life. They look different but they also sound different. I can tell them apart and I don’t just mean by their different names. They have particular ways of saying things, little gestures or mannerisms that are mentioned here and there, they have different ways of responding to the brutal scenes they witness and so on. These characters will stay in my head for a long time and although the plot is brilliant and the writing gorgeous, personally, I need to care about the characters to care about the plot.

Is it just me?

I keep imagining how I would feel about this book if the author had not created her characters so vividly. I would want to know who was killing the children and why and I would enjoy the investigation’s progress in revealing the killer. I’d appreciate the location and research gone into the story and plot. But would I care about Ava? About John, and Delayhaye and Lines? No. I wouldn’t.

And when you don’t care about the characters it makes it very hard to care what happens next…

Okay, onto the books that annoyed me recently. There have been too many but I’m going to talk about two. The first was marketed as a found footage style horror story. The blurb intrigued me and I bought it because it came up in a book group I’m in on Facebook. I added it to my to-read list months ago and finally got around to reading it recently. The story was interesting. A reporter who fears losing her job asks if she can investigate some footage that has gone viral online and her boss agrees.

The main character decides to head to the last known location of the missing friends (on her own) to find out. Despite numerous warnings and red flags on the way, (the locals are either vile to her, downright creepy and pervy, or try to tell her to go home) but she ignores them and gets to the location, which by the way, is totally secluded. I was already tiring of this character. Why would you do that? Why would you go alone?

Anyway, what then follows was a series of bad decisions on her part and the whole story stepped up a gear as she began to unravel what was going on. The plot itself was fine. It had twists and turns. I didn’t guess what was going on. But I truly did not care…

There were times when the main character was running for her life, or hiding from danger, or crying down the phone and there were times when it seemed she was about to be killed… but I did not care. I had no attachment to her whatsoever in fact I started to wish she would get killed because there was just no point in her. Zero.

The other characters were just as bad. You couldn’t tell them apart. They had different genders and different names, if that helps? That was about it. Oh, they looked different. You know, some girls had blonde pixie cuts and some boys has brown curly hair or whatever. But when they spoke they all sounded the same.

What the author did here was come up with a good horror story – a bit of a Blair Witch, if you like, and there is nothing wrong with that. What the author did not do was create any characters. He gave them names, but the main character, for example, could have been anyone. I could not tell you a single thing about her personality other than her vocation and that in my opinion she was a bit dim to go out there on her own.

Okay, the next one was similar. It was a crime thriller and part of a series. Needless to say, I won’t be reading any more in the series and I am genuinely confused about the amount of positive reviews these books have. The writing was fine, the locations were fine, the plot was fine. It involved two private investigators, one man, one woman, who I believe appear in all the books. This time they had been hired to try and solve the cold case of a missing teenage girl. There were two notorious and now behind bars, serial killers in that area at time, which made it a tad interesting. But also, I guessed really early on who had actually killed the girl.

But back to the characters. The man and the woman. That was the only way I could tell them apart. She had a son. He also had no personality and said things that any of them could have said. None of them had any mannerisms or nuances of personality. There was some back story, obviously, as its part of a series, but that didn’t seem to help give them personalities. If you met these people in real life you would be bored stiff in minutes. They were so forgettable, so banal, so pointless…

I just didn’t care.

But maybe it’s just me? Plenty of reviewers seemed to love these books but personally, I want to feel something for the characters, even if its hate and loathing! I want them to stand out from each other and everyone else. I want them to have back story, past trauma, motivations and hidden desires. I want them to be flawed and interesting and funny and smart, and, well, anything that makes them human!

I won’t be going back to those authors to find any of that.

I truly think there are two types of writers out there. Those who come up with a great idea, a concept, a plot and a way to weave it all together. They then have to shove some characters into the plot to do the heavy lifting.

And there are those that come up with everything, maybe not all at once, but bit by bit, both plot and characters developing alongside each other. Those that know the story is the character. The character is the story.

There would be no story without the character. Yes, work on the plot, weave that magic, keep the reader hooked, write beautifully and do your research… yes, yes, yes. But please, please, for the love of my sanity, remember to create the characters as well. And put the same amount of effort into them!

Genuinely though – is it just me?

Peeling Back The Layers of Black Hare Valley

Writing the companion books is revealing secrets and aiding the development of my main book’s characters.

It is official.

I am in love with Black Hare Valley.

I have created a universe I am in awe of and addicted to. It has grown and evolved into something far more beautiful and complex than I ever expected, and I am enjoying myself as a writer immensely.

The story has grown from the map me and my son created for fun during lockdown, into what will be a three book series jumping backwards and forwards in time. When my son and I created Black Hare Valley’s physical form, I had no idea what characters would emerge from it, and at that point I had no plot either. I knew I wanted it to be a creepy little town with very dark secrets, and I knew I wanted my main characters to be teenage misfits forced together to try and solve the mystery of a missing boy. But that was it.

Four years later and I cannot believe how it has grown. It seems to have a life of its own right now and I am just along for the ride. Not a day goes by when I don’t come across a secret, a reveal, or an aspect of a character I had not been aware of before. There is a lot of work to do here, but I feel like I am building something very special.

So, what do I mean by peeling back the layers?

When you start to write a book, you usually start with a location, (I had that in great detail) characters, (they started to come to me one by one before I began writing) and a plot. It was the plot I was lacking, but one day I got the first chapter in my head. I knew how the book started. I knew which characters I could introduce by writing these scenes and I knew that as soon as I started writing them, it would take off by itself. And it did.

Once I had those first few chapters and had introduced the main characters, Jesse, Paddy, Jaime, Ralph and Willow, then everything else just flowed. I still didn’t know exactly what was going to happen or why. I knew one of them would go missing and the rest would team up to try and find out why. I knew they would come up against a sinister neighbourhood watch committee made up of the fearsome Sergeant Mayfield, Mayor Margaret Sumner, Vicar Greg Roberts, Head-teacher Edward Bishop, librarian Eugenie Spires and a few more. A few chapters later I knew that my committee of adults in power were very dangerous indeed.

More began to unravel as I wrote the first draft, but even at the end of it, I still didn’t have half of what I do today. I knew the committee were ancient and had been stealing and potentially killing children for centuries in order to preserve their immortality and the town’s, but I didn’t know why or how. That all came much, much later.

With the first, second and even third draft of the first book set in 1996, I had the bare bones. The characters were growing and evolving, the location was spot on, and the how’s and why’s were starting to come together.

Somewhere along the line I began to wonder if these characters own parents had experienced similar things when they were teenagers in the 1960s. At first, I just rewrote some of the scenes with the parents to try and hint that they had also investigated the committee and also grieved a missing child, but of course, once I had that in motion, more and more stories began to rise up. The layers were unpeeling one by one.

These revelations made the 1996 book much better but also set in motion ideas for a smaller, companion book set in 1966. That then made me wonder about 2026… Which of my 1996 characters would still be in the town? What would they remember? While things appear to be solved at the end of book one, are they really?

This was incredibly exciting and led me to where I am now.

Book one (1996) begins on May Day with a child going missing. A group of unlikely teens then band together to try to find the missing boy and in the process reveal dark and dangerous secrets about their beautiful town. They also discover that children have been going missing in Black Hare Valley for a long time. Every thirty years in fact… By the end of the book the group have figured almost everything out, found out what happened to missing Paddy and fought back, to some degree. Everything is calm. They’ve got what they wanted but they still don’t know everything…

Book two (1996) also begins on May Day with another child going missing, this time the May Queen. Her sister, Angie Radley, joins forces with some other teens to try and look for her and in the process they also discover some very strange and frightening things about their town. These teens are directly related to the teens in 1996. Angie Radley is the mother of main character Jesse Archer in 1996. Nicky Archer is Jesse’s father. Lizzie Wilkins is Willow’s mother. Frankie Maxwell is Ralph’s father. Some of these characters are still alive in 1996 but they are not much help to that group of teens… By the end of this book, we have had some reveals and the group have been split up and discouraged from investigating further. There is also a reveal in this book about the character who is the most to blame for the missing children…

Book three (2026) also starts on May Day, and we meet Lila Archer, Jesse Archer’s niece and Nicky Archer’s granddaughter. She’s up to no good and soon involves herself when another child goes missing. Some of our 1996 teens are still alive. Some are not. Some of them remember what happened in ’96 and some do not. But in order to solve the mystery once and for all and put a permanent stop to the committee, they must remember what happened in ’96 and ’66…

That’s where I am right now – with the whole of book three pretty much planned out and just waiting to be written. Once I have done the messy first draft of that I’ll return to editing the first book…

Exciting times!

I have now finished the rough first draft of 1996 and I am almost half way through 2026. I know where I am going and how to get there! It feels amazing…

It really does feel like one basic idea revealed itself to be simply one layer upon a multitude of connections. I am so excited about this series!

Book Review: The Mess of Me by Chantelle Atkins

Do you ever use askDavid.com to find yourself a new book to read?

The Mess of Me by Chantelle Atkins is now listed there, along with an in depth description of the book. This site guides you with the use of categories to find books that may interest you. The Mess of Me has been listed under:

  • Eating Disorders
  • Self Harming
  • Drugs
  • Families
  • First Love
  • Violence
  • Step Families
  • Growing Up

My first published novel, The Mess of Me is about being young, growing up, hating your body and your family. Its about wanting to escape, while at the same time not having a clue what or who you want to be. It is about the people in our lives who we really know nothing about. It is about friendship and first love.

The characters I create are always flawed in some way, which for me adds to their depth and intrigue. They are the people I would be drawn to in real life, the interesting people I would like to be friends with!

Head over to the Book Review now!